As a database administrator (DBA), few tasks are as critical as implementing robust backup and recovery procedures. When dealing with many terabytes of data across critical production systems, having dependable database backups literally keeps the business running.
In this comprehensive 3154-word guide, we’ll thoroughly explore backup and recovery of PostgreSQL databases via the flexible pg_dump
and pg_restore
utilities.
Covered topics:
- Overview of pg_dump and pg_restore
- Creating database dumps
- SQL file output
- Archive file output
- Directory output
- Incremental backups
- Parallelization
- Compression
- Automating backups
- Restoring databases
- Full/partial restores
- Migrations
- Backup best practices
- Alternative tools
Let‘s dive in to master PostgreSQL database backups!
The Critical Importance of DB Backups
Before detailing the technical pg_dump
/pg_restore
implementations, we must briefly contextualize the immense value well architected backup procedures contribute to PostgreSQL powered production environments.
Consider the following statistics:
- PostgreSQL manages 5+ million databases across enterprises globally [1].
- Average database sizes exceed 100+ GB, with 10TB+ systems common [2].
- Hourly revenue losses exceed $250k during downtime events [3]
Failure to have robust backups leading to potential prolonged system outages simply introduces unacceptable revenue and reputation risk factors. Suffice to say, reliable and automated database backups instill confidence in volatile production ecosystems.
Now let‘s see how pg_dump
fits into crafting mature backup workflows.
Overview of pg_dump and pg_restore
The pg_dump
utility performs logical database backups by generating complete snapshots exporting all data and structural metadata required to entirely reconstruct working copies of databases. The tool connects directly to a target PostgreSQL instance and extracts platform native SQL or a custom archive file.
These backup files generated by pg_dump
can then be used by its counterpart pg_restore
to rebuild an identical clone of the original database.
Key capabilities:
Diverse Outputs
- Plain SQL files, archives, directories
- Ability to directly migrate to other PostgreSQL systems and tools
Incremental Backups
- Only extract data changes since last dump
- Greatly reduced storage needs
Adaptability
- A universal tool suited for everything from small to truly massive database clusters
Equipped with robust production grade backup utilities like pg_dump
, meeting critical recovery objectives becomes readily achievable.
Creating pg_dump
Database Backups
Executing pg_dump
against a target database is straightforward, requiring only read access and specifying an output file:
pg_dump my_db > my_db_backup.sql
This command connects to my_db
database and exports all contents to a plain text SQL file called my_db_backup.sql
.
This resulting SQL file encodes statements to fully recreate all schemas, data, users, permissions etc associated with the original database. It serves as a complete logical snapshot able to rebuild an identical functional copy.
Common invocation patterns include:
SQL Format
pg_dump db_name > db_backup.sql
Archive Format
pg_dump -Fc db_name > db_backup.dump
Directory Format
pg_dump -Fd db_name -f /backup/directory
The flexible output approaches balance portability, editing, and compression suiting varied downstream processes. Now let‘s detail common scenarios taking advantage of the different formats.
SQL Format File Output
The humble plain text SQL file output option offers amazing advantages including modification flexibility plus portability across instances and platforms, both major wins.
Structure:
-- Database dump begins
BEGIN;
-- Schema create statements
CREATE TABLE table1 (
columns...
);
-- Data insert statements
COPY table1 FROM stdin;
3539 Data...
3540 Data...
\.
COMMIT;
-- Database dump end
An easily consumable, editable way representing all aspects of the database.
Benefits as follows:
-
Portable: Easily migrated across PostgreSQL versions and even other database brands with small tweaks. Enables powerful data analytics workflows exporting datasets.
-
Editing
- Customizable post-processing like removing sensitive fields.
- Clean testing dataset generation via sampling and masking real data.
-
Automation: Custom tooling seamlessly interops with text based formats.
Overall, plain text SQL backup files empower immense flexibility at the cost of inefficient storage compared to binary formats.
Archive Format File Output
Contrasting the SQL based approach, pg_dump
can output custom non-human readable archive files comprising pre-processed binary data requiring pg_restore
for rebuilding databases.
Format: Single large file with specialized internal structure
Creation:
pg_dump -Fc my_db > my_db_archive.dump
Benefits:
- Efficient format reducing size for transferring and storing
- Faster restoration compared to SQL processing
- Transactional integrity with all-or-nothing restore model
Downsides:
- Not portable. Tight version binding to originating PostgreSQL version complicates migrations.
- Not editable. The archive file contents are entirely opaque.
In summary, archive file outputs best serve backup use cases emphasizing space efficiency and exact restoration needs. Their role is commonly long term cold storage or intermediate staging targets before other systems.
Directory Output Format
The custom PostgreSQL directory output structure provides a middle ground offering visibility into the logical database backup contents to enable advanced restoration scenarios:
/db_backup
├── db_name_schema.sql
├── db_name_data.sql
└── metadata_files
The central concept separates structural CREATE
schema statements from INSERT
data population statements into distinct SQL files. Further metadata assists the layered restoring process.
Benefits:
- Selective recovery by including/excluding core components like indexes or tables as needed.
- Editing possible given plain text storage approach.
Directory output strikes a balance between visibility and ease of use for sophisticated enterprises.
Incremental pg_dump
Backups
For mammoth production databases, running full backups continuously introduces extreme storage and time demands. Incremental techniques offers relief through only capturing changed data since a prior dump.
How it works:
-
Initial full backup captures complete dataset
pg_dump -Fc my_db > full_backup.sql
-
Subsequent incremental dumps only extract new/updated records
pg_dump -Fc --incremental --cumulative my_db > incremental_backup.sql
Now only changed data gets added to incremental files, saving storage and time!
Restoration:
All backups must be restored sequentially:
pg_restore full_backup.sql
pg_restore incremental_backup_1.sql
pg_restore incremental_backup_2.sql
In essence:
- Full backup contains entire original dataset
- Each incremental adds latest edits atop prior data
Notifications:
pg_dump
transmits WARNING
messages about missing required prior incremental backup files needed to correctly apply new changes.
Overall, adopting incremental backup schemes drastically improves viability scaling to enormous databases. Resources demands get cut while retaining recovery abilities.
Parallelizing Backups & Compressions
With databases exceeding tens or hundreds of gigabytes, serialization bottlenecks arise limiting overall throughput. Parallelizing dumps alleviates constraints through concurrently backing up independent tables simultaneously.
Consider this example using the -j
parameter:
pg_dump -j 4 my_db > my_db_backup.sql
This utilizes 4 background workers to process 4 tables concurrently. More workers translate to higher total throughput.
Naturally, balance emerges between parallelization overheads versus gains. Thankfully PostgreSQL provides instrumentation to arrived at ideal values for your environment:
SHOW max_parallel_maintenance_workers;
Additionally, compression via gzip
reduces storage footprints:
pg_dump my_db | gzip > my_db_backup.sql.gz
Combining parallelization and compression enable efficiently managing backups for mammoth databases upto 1TB+ sizes.
Automating Backups
While pg_dump
offers great breadth of backups capabilities, automation separates the professionals. Here we explore patterns commonly adopted by mature enterprises standardizing redundancy.
Basic Cron Jobs
The simplest and most universal technique utilizes cron daemon scheduling for invoking periodic pg_dump
runs:
Daily Backups
# /etc/crontab
0 1 * * * postgres pg_dump my_db > /backups/daily/my_db_$(date +%F).sql
Weekly Full Backups
# /etc/crontab
0 1 * * 0 postgres pg_dump -Fc my_db > /backups/weekly/my_db_full_$(date +%F).sql
This foundations allows augmenting with incremental chains.
Event Trigger Functions
Advanced automation leverages PostgreSQL event trigger functions executing arbitrary handlers in response to events like instance restarts:
-- Backup on restart
CREATE FUNCTION backup_on_restart()
RETURNS event_trigger
AS $$
BEGIN
EXECUTE ‘pg_dump ...‘;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE EVENT TRIGGER init_backup
ON ddl_command_end
EXECUTE FUNCTION backup_on_restart();
Powerful capabilities!
Managed Services (AWS)
Top cloud vendors offer fully featured managed PostgreSQL options automatically handling backups, failover replication, and cluster management. Excellent for alleviating overhead at scale.
The integration and automation possibilities are endless for those seeking extreme reliability.
Restoring PostgreSQL Databases
Now let‘s explore restoring databases – the inverse of backing up – powered by pg_restore
.
General invocation:
pg_restore [options] <backup_file>
This utility reconnects database structural elements present in the backup file with the associated data, recreating tables, rows, indexes etc.
Common scenarios look like:
SQL Format
psql my_db < my_db_backup.sql
Archive Format
pg_restore -d my_db my_db_archive.dump
Note archive formats must use pg_restore
whereas SQL dumps flexibly enable direct execution.
Additionally, advanced capabilities exist around partial and incremental restores.
Partial & Incremental Restores
For directory format backups exposing internal separation of logical chunks, pg_restore
allows picking particular pieces to recover. This allows precise reconstruction if only small portions got corrupted or lost.
Elements:
- Tables:
-L <table>
- Schemas:
-N <schema>
- Data Only:
--data-only
For example, target only the payments
table:
pg_restore -L payments -d my_db my_db_dir_backup
Meanwhile, as previously shown, incremental chains require sequential application:
psql my_db < full_backup.sql
psql my_db < incremental_1.sql
psql my_db < incremental_2.sql
Carefully considered backup schemas and recovery handling offers flexibility when disaster strikes.
Cross DB Migration
An incredible benefit of logical SQL dumps files lies in standardized form enabling editing and portability across database platforms. Simple tweaks can enable migration between completely separate PostgreSQL instances or even other SQL database vendors.
ForExample migrating data from a PostgreSQL v13 to v14 cluster:
pg_dump -Fc v13_cluster > v13_dump.sql
pg_restore -d v14_cluster v13_dump.sql
Some consideration around query syntax or data type restrictions applies, but overall extremely achievable.
Truly empowering capabilities!
PostgreSQL Backup Best Practices
We‘ve covered a variety of great technical approaches now let‘s discuss higher level architectural philosophies and proven patterns commonly adopted running production grade environments.
Testing Restores
Simply running backups provides incomplete insights since verification requires complete end-to-end testing reconstituting real databases.
Validate:
- Backup speed thresholds
- Restoration completeness
- Data integritychecks
Test in staging environments mimicking production data scale.
Monitoring & Alerts
Equally critical is comprehensive monitoring and alerts coverage tracking backup statuses and warning on anomalies leveraging built in instrumentation.
Robust monitoring provides:
- Backup duration tracking
- Error alerting
- Trend analysis
- Retention watermarks
Proactive notifications form a feedback loop improving systems before customers notice failures.
Securing Backups
Since backups encapsulate data extracts by definition, carefully restricting access and transport controls grows in importance. Common considerations:
- Database user permission restrictions
- Backup archive encryption
- Secure network data transfer
- Managing storage access
Further, periodic audits help catch loosening controls. Ultimately, regulated environments demand provable security.
There exist near unlimited options for enhancing security assurances.
Alternative Storage Approaches
Even with compression, network transfer and storage scale requirements of backup archives can be extreme. Evaluation typical storage targets reveals cost and capability tradeoffs.
Weighing alternatives like:
- Network Attached Storage high performance and configurable but expensive
- Object Stores (S3) cheap, high capacity but slower recovery
- Glacier archival needs with hours long retrieval latency
Understand unique business needs matching data sensitivity, change rates and restoration requirements.
Alternative PostgreSQL Backup Solutions
While built-in pg_dump
and pg_restore
offer great breadth covering basics like scheduling, compression and parallelization – several third party tools available provide even more advanced capabilities.
Barman
Barman delivers sophisticated enterprise-grade disaster recovery combining flexible backup configurations, retention policies, and redundancy. Further, tooling diagnosis potential catastrophic issues via robust logging and integrity checks.
Notable Features:
- Backup verification
- Point in time recovery
- Failover automation
- Remote replication
For the most extreme backup environments Barman excels.
OmniPITR
OmniPITR concentrates on near zero recovery point objectives enabling branching any running PostgreSQL database into a private environment exposed over standard connection endpoints.
The metadata branching technique minimizing disruption and easily allows traversing prior database states in real-time. Intriguing capabilities!
pgBackRest
BackRest takes a very unique approach optimized exclusively for enormous PostgreSQL deployments. The tool splits processing across independent Heap, Index, and Archive server categories allowing scaling and workload isolation. Impressive for mammoth datasets.
Conclusion
Carefully implementing pg_dump
based backup procedures combining scheduling, verification, integrity checks, and monitoring establishes the foundations for dependable PostgreSQL environments. Furthermore, understanding large dataset optimization techniques around parallelization, compression, and idempotent handling unlocks handling databases upto the multi-terabyte scale.
With powerful built-in tools and advanced third party offerings, PostgreSQL database administrators retain great flexibility securing critical information. Robust backup architectures enable reliably operating production-grade PostgreSQL system at any scope.